Workshop Reflection for Your Blog Response

            It would have been great to receive advice from each of my peers individually, but instead my peers took the approach to collectively give me advice. As a group, they reached out to me and gave insight on what I was missing out of the requirements and suggestions to how I can revise what I missing. My peers pointed out to me that I was missing the questions that I was left with after reading and analyzing my articles and journals.  They did a good job of reading my annotated bibliography, summarizing it and establishing the themes that I emphasized in my bibliography. They did not do a good job of establishing where I needed areas of improvement in my bibliography. Though my peers did not thoroughly establish the strengths and weakness of my bibliography, I still am confident that I fully explained and mostly analyzed the author’s main arguments. I am also confident that I thoroughly explained how the information I gathered from my sources will benefit me in my inquiry paper. My peers were unsuccessful with telling me their thoughts on my paper as I read or how they felt I would use each article for my inquiry. My most valuable advice was to establish questions that I was left with as I read and after I read the articles. I plan to include these questions, if any are formed, to when I revise my annotated bibliography.